Wednesday, May 6, 2009

Evaluations of Audience Feedback

I asked around what people thought of my magazine and I will now summarise those answers

 Q1: What does the title suggest to you?

The answers for this were fairly the same people said it was a heavy rock magazine for men.

 Q2: What genre/type of music does the magazine focus on and how do you know this? 

The answers again were fairly the same for this, people thought the genre was heavy rock and most people could tell this by the colours and props used in the pictures and the design of the page.

 Q3: What makes the page look professional and what stops them from looking professional?

the answers were this were varied most people said the pictures and bar code and price and different colours made it look professional, made the magazine look professional. However the down side was spelling mistakes 

 Q4: how genuine does the front cover seem? 

the answers for this were fairly the same most people thought it looked very genuine and realistic.

 Q5: does the contents page simply inform or does it also manage to interest you in reading the rest of the magazine?

the answers for this was fairly the same most people thought it informed and was not complicated  but kept it towards the points. However some people said the writing could stand out a bit more and the layout could have been different.

 Q6: Does the article sound like a piece of journalism? if not what bits don't sound right?

the answers from people are mostly the same it does sound like a piece of journalism  but it has spelling mistakes on.

 Q7: Does the article layout make you want to read it? if not Why not?

most people said yes toward this because it was basic and it attracted the audience attention

No comments:

Post a Comment